Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Strategy for 6 handed poker games

Shorthanded poker is a fascinating game. The major differences from full ring are that hand values change and their ranges are much wider than full ring. Some plays that were reckless at a full table can be profitable 6 handed.
Let's take pocket pairs for example. Would you raise a pair of deuces UTG at a full ring table ? Probably not, but when you are playing 6 handed it is always profitable to play your hand like AK.
So what are the main differences between 6 max and full ring from a strategic standpoint?
* In 6 max you can play your pocket pairs like AK from any position. Even when your c bet doesn't take down the pot your hand has more value than full ring.
* Your made hands are much stronger in 6 max games. You still have to worry about pot control but you have more room for value betting as a rule.
* A majority of pots will be played heads up or 3 handed. Because the game is more fast paced there will be numerous EV spots for the good player.
* You can make some aggressive three bets preflop such as squeeze plays. This is only because the late position openers' ranges are much wider.
Can't make up your mind on your favorite kind of game? Here is a test for you. Count up how many times you replied yes to the following questions.
* Do you like pushing your preflop equities and value betting your strong hands more often. 6 max will give you a lot of these opportunities.
* Are you a splasher, do you enjoy playing many pots in position? 6 max games favor the loose aggressive players giving them more hands to play.
* Do you take poker seriously and put in the hours ? Your hourly will be greater 6 handed because you will see more hands. This is especially true if you multi-table.
* Do you take the time to study your opponents and make your plays based on specific reads. 6 max will give the opportunity to develop great reads.
The bottom line is that the best game really comes down to your affinities and skill set. It also depends on your aversion to risk.

No comments: